User talk:Piotrus
: 632
: 82
: 6
: 22
 You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
|
|
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above. |
|---|
|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
|---|
|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
|---|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
Lurking stats
[edit]| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
Dr. van Wijk
[edit]Cześć, Piotrus. I hope your new year is off to an excellent start. Last month, you kindly reviewed my DYK nomination for Nicolaas van Wijk and expressed an interested in reviewing it at WP:GAN if no one reviewed it by mid-January. I'm writing in the hopes you might still be interested, since February is nearly here and no one has begun a review. No problem if the answer is no, but I figured I should ask. Best, ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ThaesOfereode Thanks for the ping. I'll try to find time next week as this week I am busy with a bunch of other stuff, on and off-wiki, although I can't promise anything. But feel free to poke me :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- No worries; figured I'd ask! ThaesOfereode (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Na drugą planetę
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Na drugą planetę you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Zaziemskie światy
[edit]The article Zaziemskie światy you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Zaziemskie światy for comments about the article, and Talk:Zaziemskie światy/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SirBrahms -- SirBrahms (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Science Fiction Chronicle
[edit]
On 1 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Science Fiction Chronicle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the magazine Science Fiction Chronicle changed its name to just Chronicle two decades after its launch, to avoid being confused with the San Francisco Chronicle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Science Fiction Chronicle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Science Fiction Chronicle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.